The drama in Imo State chapter of the All Progressive Congress, APC is taking another twist as the judiciary has again stepped in to obstruct proceedings.
As at the time of going to Press, Trumpeta learnt that a Federal High Court in Abuja has restrained the Independent National Electoral Commissioner, INEC, Imo State Governor, Owelle Rochas Okorocha and his factional APC from parading/conducting any primary election or anything in like manner in the State pending the determination of suit before it.
Trumpeta recalls that the issue of congress of APC in Imo State has been a subject of litigation. It would be recalled that Federal High Court, Owerri had after the convention nullified the earlier congresses before the one conducted by the Okorocha faction last week.
This newspaper was told that Imo APC stakeholders, otherwise known as the Allied Forces on getting the knowledge of the fresh congress for Imo APC went to court to seek for notice through its counsel, Raji (SAN).
The court failed to grant the expert order for an injunction restraining the fresh congress but only ordered that the defendants be put on notice.
On the resumed hearing, the Federal High Court Abuja, on Monday ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission, (INEC), the All Progressives Congress, (APC) and the National Chairman, APC, not to conduct any congress in Imo until Aug. 21.
The court also ordered the plaintiffs, Sen. Osita Izunaso, Sen. Ben Uwajimogu , Mr Mathew Omegara, Mr Hilary Ekeh and Mr Patrick Uzoukwu to maintain status quo until Aug. 21
The vacation judge, Jutice Babatunde Quadri gave the order following an application by Mr Ahmed Raji, (SAN), counsel to the plaintiffs.
Raji had asked the court to order that all parties be restrained from conducting any primaries in the state, ward or local government until the next adjourned date of the suit.
He said that if such and order was not made and the defendants went ahead to conduct the primaries before the next adjourned date, the suit would become an academic exercise.
Raji told the court that although the defendants were duly served with an order of court stopping them from conducting congresses on July 20, they went ahead to conduct the congresses.
The senior lawyer argued that consequently, on July 23, the plaintiffs filed a motion ex parte praying the court to set aside the purported congresses.
He said they further asked the court for an order of injunction restraining APC and its chairman from recognizing and swearing in those purportedly elected at the congresses.
“The court, however in its wisdom refused to grant this order and ordered us to put them on notice, and we did and duly served all processes on them but there has been no response from them.’’
Responding, counsel to the defendants, Mr Oladipo Okpeseyi , (SAN) told the court that he had just been briefed about the matter.
According to Okpeseyi, all I could achieve as at today is to file a memorandum of conditional appearance.
Okpeseyi alluded to the fact that his clients had been unable to file the proper responses owing to the “political maneuvering” they had recently been faced with including the mass defection from the party.
“The executive members of the party have not been around so the best we could do is to file a memorandum of conditional appearance.
“We want to crave the indulgence of the court to give us more time within which to file our processes.’’
He prayed the court for an adjournment to enable him file the necessary processes.
The plaintiff’s counsel, however, disagreed with Okpeseyi’s reason for his inability to file his processes saying such reasons were not permissible in law.
According to him, this unusual and unheard-of oral application of the defendant has no basis and should be rejected because the alleged defection he alluded to happened after they were served with processes.
Justice Quadri in a short ruling, ordered all parties in the suit to maintain status quo and not conduct any primaries until the next adjourned date.
“All parties are restrained from conducting any primaries in the state, ward or local government until Aug. 21.’’
He awarded a cost of N10, 000 against the defendants for not filing their processes within the stipulated time and adjourned the matter until Aug. 21 to allow the defendants regularize their processes.
In the originating summons, the plaintiffs have formulated four questions for the court to determine.
One of which is that having regard to an appeal pending before the Court of Appeal in Owerri, whether INEC has the power to monitor the state, ward and local government congresses of the APC of July 20.
“Whether the APC and its chairman have the powers to lawfully schedule or conduct the state, ward and local government primaries in the state without 21 days’ notice given to INEC in line with mandatory provisions of Section 85 (1) of the Electoral Act, 2010.’’
Consequently, the plaintiffs are asking for the following reliefs;“ A declaration that having regard to the appeal pending before the Court of Appeal in Owerri, INEC has no power to monitor state, ward and local government congresses of the APC of July 20.
“A declaration that the state, ward and local government congresses of the APC purportedly scheduled to hold in Imo on July 20 is illegal, unlawful, null and void and a gross abuse of court process.
“An order of injunction restraining INEC from monitoring state, ward and local government congresses of the APC purportedly scheduled to hold in Imo on July 20.
“An order nullifying or setting aside the state, ward and local government congresses of the APC scheduled to hold or which held in Imo on July 20.
